The effectiveness of the E5 teaching model on the executive functions of Intellectual disability students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.A. of General Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Psychology, Iqbal Lahori Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Psychology, Iqbal Lahori Institute of Higher Education, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of the E5 teaching design model (activation, exploration, explanation, elaboration and evaluation) on the executive functions of Intellectual disability male students in elementary school. The present study was a semi-experimental with an unequal control group design. The statistical population of this research consists of all male students with mild slowness in the second semester of 1401-1400 academic year in Mashhad, whose number is 650, and among these people, 34 were selected by random cluster sampling and randomly divided into 2 experimental groups. (17 people) and the control group (17 people) were replaced. For 20 sessions (during 5 weeks), each session of 30 minutes, the experimental group received the lesson of social studies and science of the fifth grade of elementary school with the E5 teaching model. In this research, London Tower (TOL), Wisconsin (WCST), Stroop (SCWT), continuous function (CPT), go no go test (GNGT) software were used to measure students' executive functions, and multivariate covariance analysis and spss-26 software were used for data analysis. According to the findings of the research, it can be explained that the E5 teaching design model can have a significant positive effect on the executive functions of Intellectual disability students.

Keywords

References

 
AbdulRaheem, Y. (2018). In Search of a more effective strategy: Using the 5E Instructional Strategy to teach Civin education in Seniory Schools in Nigeria. Journal of International Social Studies. 8(4), 63-79
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition Revised. Washington. D.C.: Author. ISBN: 978-0-89042-025-6.
Axelrod, B. N., Woodard, J. L., & Henry, R. H. (1992). Analysis of an abbreviated form of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 6(1), 27–31.
Barkley, R. A. (2013). Taking charge of ADHD: The complete, authoritative guide for parents. London: Guilford Press.
Boddy, N., Watson, K., & Aubusson, P. (2003). A trial of the five es: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Research in Science Education. 33, 27-42.
Cakir, N. K. (2017). Effect of E5 learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: meta-analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 5(11), 105- 118.
Dawson, P., & Guare R. (2018). Executive skills in children and adolescents: a practical guide to assessment and intervention. London: Guilford Publications.
Fazelian, P., & Soraghi, S. (2010). The effect of 5E instructional design model on learning and retention of sciences for middle class students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5, 140-143.
Goldberg, T., & Weinberger, D. R. (1988). Probing prefrontal function in schizophrenia with neuropsychological paradigms. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 14, 149, - 183.
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Exceptional learners: an introduction to special education (13th Ed). Published by Pearson Education, Inc.
Injoque-Ricle, I., & Burin, D. (2011). Working Memory and Planning in children: validation of the Tower of London Task. Revista Neuropsicologia Latinoamericana. 3(2), 31-38.
Kapoula, Z., Lê, T. T., Bonnet, A., Bourtoire, P., Demule, E., Fauvel, C., Catherine, Q. & Yang, Q. (2010). Poor Stroop performances in 15-year-old dyslexic teenagers. Experimental Brain Research. 203(2), 419- 425.
Karsli, F. & Ayas, A. (2014). Developing a Laboratory Activity by Using 5e Learning Model on Student Learning of Factors Affecting the Reaction Rate and Improving Scientific Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 143, 663– 668.
Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., & Pullen, P. C. (2017). Handbook of special education. Routledge.
Kongs, S. K., Thompson, L. L., Iverson, G. L., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Card Version. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. Newyork: Oxford University Press.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109(2), 163.
Maraver M. J., Bajo M. T., Gomez-Ariza C. J. (2016). Training on working memory and inhibitory control in young adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10, 588-592.
Ms, R., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). The Enhancement of Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics through The 5E Learning Cycle with Metacognitive Technique. In International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education. Atlantis Press.
O'Connel, R. G., Bellgrove, M. A., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Avenues for the neuro remediation of ADHD: lessons from clinical neurosciences. In: Fitzgerald M, Bellgrove M, Gill M, Editors. Handbook of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Robyn, M., Rafter, M. (2020). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education. 87, 102951.
Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 298(1089), 199-209.
Siwawetkul, W., & Koraneekij, P. (2018). Effect of 5E instructional model on mobile technology to enhance reasoning ability of lower primary school students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 5, 1-6.
Spreen, O., & Strauss E. A. (1991). compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press.
Suciati, A. (2015). Vincentrisia Ismiyatin. Application of learning cycle model (5E) learning with chart variation toward student's creativity. Journal pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 4(3), 56-66.
Wodka, E. L., Mark Mahone, E., Blankner, J. G., Gidley Larson, J. C., Fotedar, S., Denckla, M. B., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2007). Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 29(4), 345-356.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 April 2022
  • Revise Date: 11 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 June 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics