Empowering Exceptional Children

Empowering Exceptional Children

Comparison of the Cognitive Profile of Dyslexia, Dyscalculia and Normal Students based on the Components of the Tehran-Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Education of children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 professor, Department of Psychology and Education of children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3 Ph.D student in psychology and Education of people with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
4 Associate professor, Department of Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
The purpose was to compare the cognitive profiles of dyslexia, dyscalculia and normal students based on the components of the Tehran-Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. The present study was causal-comparative. The statistical population of this study included all dyslexia, dyscalculia and normal students studying in the third to fifth grades of primary schools in Tehran in the academic year 2021-2022. The research sample included 23 dyslexia (13 boys, 10 girls), 25 dyscalculia (14 boys, 11 girls), and 30 normal students (15 girls, 15 boys). In order to diagnose dyslexia and dyscalculia, in addition to the diagnosis of learning disability centers, were used Iran Key-Math Diagnostic Test (IKMDT) and the Dyslexia Test (NEMA), the Tehran- Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test (SBIT). The research findings were analyzed using SPSS21 multivariate analysis of variance. There was a significant difference between the normal group and the groups with disabilities in the components of the intelligence test (p<0.01). However, there was no significant difference between dyslexia and dyscalculia students in the components of the Stanford-Binet intelligence test (p>0.05). The results shows that only based on the comparison and use of the scores of the components of intelligence tests, it is not possible to separate the dyslexia and dyscalculia simply. It is suggested that in order to accurately diagnose and separate these two groups, and the use of multiple diagnostic criteria, including the use of tests and experts' diagnosis, can lead to More accurate diagnosis of these two disorders.
Keywords

Subjects


Allen, K., Higgins, S., & Adams, J. (2019). The relationship between vision-spatial working memory and mathematical performance in school-aged children: a systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 509-531.‏
 American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Bays, P. M. (2015). Spikes not slots: Noise in neural populations limits working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(8), 431-438.
Beaujean, A. A., Benson, N. F., McGill, R. J., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2018). A misuse of IQ scores: Using the dual discrepancy/consistency model for identifying specific learning disabilities. Journal of Intelligence, 6(3), 36.‏
Benavides-Varela, S., Callegher, C. Z., Fagiolini, B., Leo, I., Altoè, G., & Lucangeli, D. (2020). Effectiveness of digital-based interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 157, 103953.‏
Chuderski, A., & Necka, E. (2012). The contribution of working memory to fluid reasoning: Capacity, control, or both? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(6), 1689–1710.
Cirık, M., Sak, U., Arslan, D., Opengin, E., & Karaduman, E. (2023). ASIS Cognitive Profiles of Children with Learning Disabilities. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 39(1), 72-80.‏
Farris, E. A., Alexander, E. E., & Odegard, T. N. (2020). Assessment and identification of learning disabilities. The clinical guide to assessment and treatment of childhood learning and attention problems, 3-32.
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford Publications.
Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Wagner, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37.‏
Guerin, J. M., Sylvia, A. M., Yolton, K., & Mano, Q. R. (2020). The role of fluid reasoning in word recognition. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 19-40.‏
Krawec, J. L. (2014). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students of varying math ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103-115.
Luoni, C., Scorza, M., Stefanelli, S., Fagiolini, B., & Termine, C. (2023). A neuropsychological profile of developmental dyscalculia: The role of comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(4), 310-323.‏
Meiran, N., Dreisbach, G., & von Bastian, C. C. (2019). Mechanisms of working memory training: Insights from individual differences. Intelligence, 73)6), 78-87.‏
Miciak, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). The critical role of instructional response for identifying dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 53(5), 343-353.‏
Partanen, P., Jansson, B., & Sundin, Ö. (2020). Fluid reasoning, working memory and planning ability in assessment of risk for mathematical difficulties. Educational Psychology in Practice, 36(3), 229-240.
Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford -Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, Technical Manual. pro.ed, Austin, Texas.
Shawky, A., Elbiblawy, E., & Maresch, G. (2020). Spatial ability differences between students with a math learning disability and their other normal colleagues. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences.‏
Soares, N., Evans, T., & Patel, D. R. (2018). Specific learning disability in mathematics: a comprehensive review. Translational pediatrics, 7(1), 48.
Spruijt, A. M., Ziermans, T. B., Dekker, M. C., & Swaab, H. (2020). Educating parents to enhance children’s reasoning abilities: A focus on questioning style. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66, 101102.‏
Toffalini, E., Giofrè, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2017). Strengths and weaknesses in the intellectual profile of different subtypes of specific learning disorder: a study on 1,049 diagnosed children. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(2), 402-409.‏
Wang, L. C., Tasi, H. J. and Yang, H. M. (2012), Cognitive inhibition in students with and without dyslexia and dyscalculia. Research in developmental disabilities, 33(5), 1453-1461.

  • Receive Date 09 April 2024
  • Revise Date 19 June 2024
  • Accept Date 02 October 2024